I am working my way through ACCA's latest manual LLH (Low Load Homes). The postulate of continuous fan increases indoor humidity in the cooling season arises in Section 8. This principle has been shouted from the roof tops of many building science venues for years. And up until this point, I have embraced that Kool-Aid with the masses. 

The subject matter is discussed in an Allison Bailes article found here from 2012.   https://www.energyvanguard.com/blog/76674/This-Thermostat-Setting-C... 

Apparently, I am a slow learner. Because, as I think about the physics, it isn't intuitive to me. Perhaps someone can clarify it, possibly Dr Bailes.

Assume a heat pump air handler with duct system that is entirely in the conditioned space. Cooling is energized. Coil gets cold and falls below dew point of the return inlet air. Humidity in the air changes from vapor to liquid. Condensation flows down the fins of the coil into the drain pan and hopefully is drained out of the unit to the exterior. Compressor shuts off, leaving X amount of liquid water on the coil. 

This is where I stumble. If the blower shuts off with the compressor, the condensation resident on the coil just sits there and eventually evaporates or dries to the ambient air in the air handler. And since the duct work is connected to the conditioned space (technically just another unspecified room of the house), that evaporated moisture eventually becomes part of the air in the living space. Hence it will elevate the indoor RH. 

Second scenario is the blower runs continuously, which does have a lot of desirable benefits. The air dries the coil quicker. Consequently, you might see a spike in the indoor humidity levels. 

But in the end, I don't see the difference. One introduces additional humidity over time. The other in less time. 

One possible difference is the unit energizes before the coil gets completely dry. That would tend to imply the coil stay predominately wet and there is a consistent reservoir of condensation that simply stays put much like a hydrophilic buffer.  Even if this is so, it needs to stop to inhibit microbiological and biofilm production. 

Any comments to straighten me out????

Tags: Allison, Bailes, Blower, Continuous, Elevated, Humidity

Views: 300

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Although I haven't personally measured coil moisture, it stands to reason that what you describe in your last paragraph may not be a small impact. Having looked at a lot of AC cycle graphs over the years, I would posit that the "off cycles" are typically too short to see much if any natural ('still' air) evaporation, thus most residual coil moisture at the end of the cooling cycle ends up contributing to the drip-off during the next cycle, and so on. The blower (between cycles) will dramatically increase evaporation since it only takes a few seconds for the coil temp to climb above the dew point after the compressor shuts down.

As an aside, please say more about "it needs to stop" in your last sentence...

David,  My reference was that the coil needs to dry at least some time within a 24 hr period to reduce the risk of microbial growth and the creation of bio film. 

Depending on loads and how the stat is managed, there's usually one extended off-cycle per day, long enough for coil to fully dry. But if you still want continuous blower (for other reasons), at least employ an air handler, stat, or 3rd party control that interrupts the fan for the first few minutes after each cooling cycle to maximize post-cycle drip-off.

In my climate it's just the opposite... Here it makes sense to run the fan (at normal speed) for at least five minutes post-cycle, thus providing an evaporative cooling bonus.

DB,  Since I always spec a whole house dehumidifier, it doesn’t cause me to loose any sleep.

All cooling coils which remove moisture (which is most of them!) require a drain pan below them to capture this. So much is known and ideally this would be either stainless steel or an approved thermoplastic or ABS for corrosion protection. 

The missing link in your post is how that moisture is drained away.  It cannot, as you suggest, simply re-evaporate; that would defeat the purpose. 

Enter the drain line- not just a line leaving the unit and hoping for the best, but one with a P-trap seal. 

 Consider that the suction side of the fan, where most cooling coil drain pans would be, is under a negative pressure. That fan is sucking air in and with sufficient pressure to keep water in place.  Only when the fan is off (assuming you have this drain connection piped at all), will the water drain. 

So what does this P-trap do?  

The P-trap has a certain depth and allows water to fill it. This forms a seal to atmospheric pressure. 

The difference in elevation between the drain pan low-point and the out-flowing drain pipe on the other side of the trap, is deeper than the static pressure at the fan suction.  In my institutional work, this can be four to six inches. In a house, two inches is usually sufficient but it depends on the system pressure above all.

It seems counter-intuitive, but this trap seal helps the water drain.  It does this by allowing the water enough height to stack up and develop sufficient "head" to force/allow the water to drain out of the downstream port. 


@Bradford, Danny is referring to residual moisture that remains adhered to the coil after the compressor cycles off. Due to adhesion, a meaningful amount of bulk water will remain on the coil rather than dripping off into the catch pan. Eventually, that moisture will evaporate back into the air.

Got it and understood thank you. I was figuring if there was a problem, the water was not leaving the unit.

That amount of moisture though is negligible though, at least in large, high-latent air handling units.

For example, a 10,000 cfm 100% OA air handler taking air from 91/74 down to 52 saturated (19.4 delta enthalpy and 451.8 MBH latent heat) will remove about 430 lbs of moisture per hour at that rate. 

That is 7.2 lbs. per minute or a bit under a gallon per minute.  0.12 lbs. moisture removal per second.

The residence time on the coil at 500 fpm and a 10-row coil (12 inches deep) and 20 SF of coil face area is less than 1.5 seconds. 

The total amount of moisture on that surface area at any given time is about 0.18 lbs. 0.022 gallons.  About a third of an ounce. Spilling the residue of your last ice cube. 

I do not see that amount of moisture on that size of coil as a problem, let alone a 3 SF residential coil with limited outside air.

Bradford wrote:

>I do not see that amount of moisture on that size of coil as a problem, let alone a 3 SF residential coil with limited outside air.

Probably not. But to Danny's point, a lot of folks in residential building science & home performance warn that continuous fan can contribute to indoor humidity problems, especially in the extra-humid Southeast. The tiny unitary mechanical systems (often mini-splits, which are already latent constrained) being installed in super low load homes sometimes have trouble keeping up with latent loads, typically associated with ventilation (or over-ventilation, in my opinion). Also, the latent loads associated with occupancy begin to loom large when you ratchet down the sensible load. You can manage all of that with a built-up system but we're talking about homes with sensible design loads as low as 3 BTUH/ft2!

That is why I like VRF systems, David.  We agree especially in the humid south and of course with cycling in general of on-off single-capacity systems.

Inverter drives are the current ideal and I use them whenever I can on larger systems (which are lagging in that technology vs. residences).

Any system that can use dehumidification priority, ramping down fan speed and modulating refrigerant, as has been done for 20 years or more, is essential. 

I do not see anything wrong with continuous fan use though. Absent fan heat added, it is an enthalpy-neutral process. It is the refrigerant side that has the work to do.

But out of this discussion, I think we can agree that the off-cycling of the compressor after the sensible load is satisfied, is much more of an issue than a residual film of moisture on an evaporator whether or not the fan continues to run.



Bradford - I have seen single family homes with ducted central AC or heat pump hold enough water upon shutdown that the living space relative humidity increased >10% when the fan was left on. I'm sure there is some diversity among the equipment and installations out there, but some residential systems do hold back enough water to make a more than measurable impact on the conditioned space relative humidity.

I have not seen similar behavior on the few mini-split systems I have monitored. They seem to operate with a high SHR when cooling and do not remove much water vapor. I assume they are trying to maximize sensible cooling efficiency by avoiding latent removal. So if you have a system which runs with a high SHR cycling with the fan on is probably not a big deal, but if you have a system set up to run cold and lower SHR they can hold enough water into an off cycle to cause humidity problems if the fan is left on.

Danny - you are correct. An evaporator with no airflow over it will dry out slowly. Keeping the airmover on and some air velocity over the evaporator increases the liquid water evaporation rate exponentially.

The inside of the evaporator plenum becomes cool and very humid with the airmover turned off and the diffusion of the water vapor out away from (and heat energy into) that plenum is pretty slow so the rate of evaporation from the wet coil is very slow. Turning the airmover on and moving air over the wet coil moves the evaporated water vapor out of the coil plenum space rapidly providing a constant supply of "fresh" drier air eager to evaporate more liquid water from the coil. That supply of "fresh" air also brings energy in the form of heat which is transferred to the wet coil to provide more energy for evaporation.

I believe most A/C system evaporators running at part load do not dry out between many of the cooling cycles if the system fan is shut off with the compressor (or does not overrun too long after) while systems with the fan left running after the compressor shuts off will completely dry the evaporator on many more off cycles. So there is some nuance here - a long enough off cycle will dry the evaporator either way, but the fan left on will dry the evaporator in a matter of minutes and the compressor will need to "rewet" the evaporator every cooling cycle before any liquid water drips into the drain pan and is removed from the space greatly increasing the effective sensible heat ratio of a system in cyclic operation.

As I have read through everyone's excelent responses, it has caused me to reassess my assumptions. Tim O'Brien made a observation that is rightly relevant when he provided,

"I believe most A/C system evaporators running at part load do not dry out between many of the cooling cycles if the system fan is shut off with the compressor (or does not overrun too long after) while systems with the fan left running after the compressor shuts off will completely dry the evaporator on many more off cycles " 

This is an excellent reminder and may be a bigger issue than I thought. Absent an initiator to increase molecular activity, H20 wil be completely content to reside on the coil between cycles. So my premise that the coil will eventually dry isn't as cut and "dried" as it seems. 

However, when the blower stays on, the return air increases the water's activity, which is no longer content to stay in liquid form. 

Another factor that came to me from some of David B's comments is the blower speed has a huge influence on drying after an off cycle. If the mfr allows high speed air on fan only, the coil warms faster and dumps more water vapor into the air from high bypass factor. If the mfr programs the blower to run at 50% or 30%, the coil stays cool longer and less vaporization takes place from low bypass factor.

Now the question is, if the compressor must cycle, is it better to dry the coil or leave it wet during off cycles. It would appear benefical for moisture drainage to allow the coil to retain this buffer to enhance water drain from the fins. BUT there is a risk of creating biofilm and microbial activity. Might even see some Stachy in that pan. 


Latest Activity

Leslie Jackson liked Larry Weingarten's blog post Hot Water Heaven
10 hours ago
Emily Ambrose posted a blog post

Advanced Landing Pages: Why Going the Extra Mile Matters

Growing up, whenever guests were expected for dinner or a long weekend visit, my mother would spend…See More
Brett Little's video was featured

Intro to All Electric Multifamily Housing Design

Come learn from the most experienced zero-carbon multi-family designer in North America, Sean Armstrong of Redwood Energy, as he discusses heat pump hot tubs...
Brett Little posted videos
Brett Little posted events
Mia Rubinstein liked Brett Little's event Viewpoints to Downsize: Living Large In A Small House - FREE CE Webinar
Profile IconErnest V F Hodgson, Gary Fuchs and Morts Online joined Home Energy Pros Forum
Mike Rutkowski replied to Diane Chojnowski's discussion Presentation slides from the 2019 Building Science Summer Camp
"Cannot Open."
Kent Browning replied to Tom Smith's discussion Are Energy Efficient Windows worth the investment?
"As others have said - replacement windows are helpful for comfort but don't expect them to…"
Kent Browning replied to Diane Chojnowski's discussion Presentation slides from the 2019 Building Science Summer Camp
"I am pretty sure those are not the Summer Camp slides. You should probably change your title to…"
Todd Crawford liked Diane Chojnowski's discussion Presentation slides from the 2019 Building Science Summer Camp
Building Performance Association posted a blog post

© 2019   Created by Building Performance Association   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service