Today I received a request to test 4 units for a small apartment building.  He says the building is 32x52 which is 1560 SF.  There is 4 apartments which are 1 bedroom and living room plus bath and small kitchen.  If I test each unit, I suspect they are approx 400 SF.  These units will have to be very tight.  He wants me to open all the doors and test from one end of the hall.  I have never done this is 10 years so not sure this is kosher.

Any thoughts.

Thanks

Jerry

Views: 602

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sorry but LMAO - one blower door for that small of a space gives you an accurate number for the building because it is no bigger than a small home. Now if the inspector for some reason wants each unit tested, well...

As for marriage wall leakage that is actually a bigger issue - forget the noise, salmon or XYZ cooking complaints but that marriage wall is also a firewall, If you have detectable measures of leakage guess what a fire is going to find and race right through? That's one of the biggest issues I have with many of these multifamily testers - they are doing a major disservice to not only the builder but the people who are going to live there & thinking it is a safe place when they do these guarded or whatever they want to call them tests

Scott Katznelson   In 2013,  I had my HERS Field Review completed on a multi-family unit.  I did and end unit, and my QAD set a blower door in the adjacent unit.  We tested both units.  The difference between guarded and unguarded was less then the +/- variance in the Multipoint Tests.  I have been involved with 3 more multi-family units since then.  I have tested at least one unit on a guarded / unguarded basis for comparison.I have consistently obtained results with this variance.  If you observe the construction and air sealing before you test,  you will eliminate the problems before you have to fix them.  We do need to get a firewall determination for all of these firewalls about what products are acceptable for air sealing.  That was the biggest problem I had with the 28 units this year.

Most of the work I do is retrofit of older buildings. Marriage wall leakage is often significant, although typically more through duct leakage between units than through the wall itself.

The way we'd normally do this is to mount one blower door in the hallway, then a duct tester blower door in the individual unit. You'd first test the total leakage of the unit with adjacent apt windows open which will give you the total leakage of the apt. Then you turn on the hallway blower door so the hallway pressure equaled the apt pressure the reduction you see if the wall to the hall. Then open one apt door and close the window and the change is the shared wall, repeat for apt on the other side and you see the reduction as the shared wall with that apt. Now you've got leakage to outdoors which has the leakage between floors included but that should be small. 

Alternatively, one blower door in the hallway could be used to measure the total leaks of all four. 

What's important is to understand what they/he want to measure. Once clear on that, we can come up with a way to measure it. 

Thank You, Colin!  Those are very good points and processes to do some Zone Pressure Diagnostics techniques applied to multi family buildings.

Thanks Colin

Interesting subject and many good answers. Thank you Jerry for the question.

I have never ran into this but have a good understanding of the concept My first thought was with as small as it is to simply test it as one unit. But Scott made a good point and the data might be good overall with a one door test for all. But five blower doors in 1500 sq ft seemed inefficient yet accurate. 

Colin's approach which lets face it we are lucky to have his knowledge rolling onto the post made allot of sense. it use the tools in a basic professionals box which the only thing that might not be standard is a frame and cape for a duct tester and provide zone techniques with accurate measurements.

I have copied and pasted his answer in case I need it for future reference or I want to look exceptionally smart on a board one day in the future.

Great discussion and thank you to all.

Retrotec has a tubing hookup diagram in their multi-fan manual that is available on line for free. 

It highly depends on the purpose of the test. If you are testing it for code compliance, then there is no need for such tests. If you would test each unit individually then it automatically eliminates the pesky adiabatic leakage.

RSS

Forum Discussions

How to Insulate Exposed Outdoor Ductwork?? Help

Started by Daniel Baur-McGuire in General Forum. Last reply by Franco Oyuela yesterday. 8 Replies

REALLY????

Started by Danny Gough in HVAC. Last reply by Danny Gough on Saturday. 12 Replies

Where to spend my marketing dollars?

Started by Trip Smith in Marketing. Last reply by Building Performance Institute May 14. 10 Replies

Easy Tests for HVAC during audit

Started by Craig Bird in Weatherization. Last reply by John White May 9. 19 Replies

Water heater ventilation question

Started by Luis Hernandez in General Forum. Last reply by Dennis Heidner May 8. 23 Replies

Polar vortex photos of ice forming INSIDE homes!

Started by Diane Chojnowski in General Forum. Last reply by Michael Cuomo May 4. 1 Reply

LEED for Homes Green Rater Training

Started by Ryan Moore in Training. Last reply by Michael Cuomo May 3. 1 Reply

Latest Activity

Jimothy Whisnant added 2 discussions to the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
3 hours ago
Building Performance Association's blog post was featured
6 hours ago
Franco Oyuela commented on John White's blog post Common Reasons Your Air Conditioner Is Not Turning On
"The AC unit won’t turn on: 1. Tripped Circuit Breaker2. Blown Fuse3. Clogged Condensate…"
15 hours ago
Franco Oyuela commented on John White's blog post Common Air Conditioning Problems and Their Possible Solutions
"Top Air Conditioning Problems and Solutions 1. The A/C Stops Working Completely. When the air…"
15 hours ago
tedkidd liked Jim Gunshinan's blog post Is Geothermal a Realistic Way to Achieve True Energy Independence? by Sallie McBrien
17 hours ago
tedkidd liked Jim Gunshinan's blog post Is Geothermal a Realistic Way to Achieve True Energy Independence? by Sallie McBrien
17 hours ago
Chris Heenan commented on Jim Gunshinan's blog post Is Geothermal a Realistic Way to Achieve True Energy Independence? by Sallie McBrien
"Article written by a Realtor. WSHP have very high efficiency but they significant install _and_…"
17 hours ago
Building Performance Association posted a blog post
19 hours ago

© 2019   Created by Building Performance Association   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service