I have to agree with the Tea Party; the US government should not choose the light bulbs I use in my home.  And fortunately, it does not.

Yet that’s the spin being pushed by those who want to roll back federal lighting performance standards. An odd mythology is developing around the standards.

Opponents claim that the standards amount to government picking and choosing winners and forcing them upon us. More specifically, they say that the feds have banned the incandescent light bulb, which has been around since Thomas Edison’s time.

This is not true; the incandescent light bulb is not being banned; the standards are agnostic about technology type as long as they perform as required. The 2007 law is meant to act as a market mechanism that encourages innovation. With a benchmark to work towards, scientists, engineers and product designers are working to displace older, inefficient devices.  Already several different kind of light bulbs have made their way into the marketplace, including a new and better incandescent.

We have efficiency standards not only for light bulbs, but also for refrigerators, water heaters, air conditioners, microwaves and other appliances. They are nothing new.  Those who see them as government intrusion may be surprised to find that the first US appliance standards were set under Ronald Reagan.

Still one might ask, do we really need appliance standards? Are they worth the bother? That’s a $300 billion question – the amount the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy estimates the US will save on electricity costs by 2030 through existing appliance and lighting standards. 

Here are other important points about appliance standards made by Steven Nadel, ACEEE’s executive director, in a testimony on March 10 before the US Senate’s Energy and Natural Resource Committee. Nadel urged that Congress reject S. 395, the Better Use of Light Bulbs Act (BULB), which would repeal lighting standards set in 2007 under the Bush administration.

  • Appliance standards generated 340,000 net jobs in the U.S. in 2010.
  • The majority of the standards are based on consensus agreements between manufacturers and energy efficiency advocates.
  • Four types of bulbs already meet the standards, although the standards do not take effect until 2012. Two are incandescent bulbs.
  • The 2007 lighting standards, alone, are expected to reduce annual electricity use by 72 billion kWh by 2020, enough to serve the annual electricity needs of 6.6 million average households and avoid construction of about 30 power plants.
  • ACEEE forecasts that the lighting standards will reduce consumer energy bills by more than $7 billion by 2020, or about $50 per American household annually.
  • A recent USA Today survey of 1,016 adults found that despite misinformation circulated about a light bulb ban, 61% of Americans favor the 2007 lighting standards, while 31% say they are  bad.

This blog is open source & copyright free with attribution to www.realenergywriters.com

Views: 118

Comment

You need to be a member of Home Energy Pros Forum to add comments!

Join Home Energy Pros Forum

Comment by Elizabeth Guinn on March 30, 2011 at 9:20am
Enjoy your blog immensely.  Great article.

Forum Discussions

Low Leakage home with cathedral ceiling

Started by Dav Camras in General Forum. Last reply by David Butler on Friday. 3 Replies

2005 EPAct tax credit

Started by Mandy Leazenby in General Forum. Last reply by Mandy Leazenby on Thursday. 2 Replies

ASHRAE 62.2 Help

Started by Melissa Baldridge in HVAC. Last reply by Melissa Baldridge Dec 1. 5 Replies

Latest Activity

Horace Douglas Hunt, Jr. replied to Travis Freethy's discussion Blower Door & Duct blaster for sale. in the group Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase
"is this still for sale?"
yesterday
Jim Ballman is now a member of Home Energy Pros Forum
yesterday
Tim replied to Shawna Henderson's discussion Exterior Insulation for Deep Energy Retrofits
"Hey Shawna, Have you worked with thermal insulation coatings? They are normally a modified…"
yesterday
David Butler replied to Dav Camras's discussion Low Leakage home with cathedral ceiling
"With a vented cathedral ceiling, getting a tight envelope is difficult, but not impossible. Various…"
Friday
Home Performance Coalition liked Summer Reyes's blog post Equipment We Use: Detecting Water With Infrared Cameras
Friday
Home Performance Coalition liked Jim Gunshinan's blog post Cool—and Warm—Clothing
Friday
Home Performance Coalition liked Dannie Jackson's blog post Split Level Solarized Home Models
Friday
Jim Baerg replied to Shawna Henderson's discussion Exterior Insulation for Deep Energy Retrofits
"I did 2 projects last year, both on houses where the siding was being replaced.  The first, in…"
Friday

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service