Take the truckload of chocolate away from the 5 year olds.

Does anyone else feel the present precipitous drop in energy costs in these United States is a catastrophe? 

Does anyone else feel the US Gov is once again missing the opportunity of a lifetime to fix at least 2 problems with one move? 

Does anyone else feel that with energy prices dropping, more consumers, corporate and private, will gorge on energy again? 

How do we prevent that?  How do we reduce the deficit?  How do we keep the public thinking about conservation in a time of gluttony? 

I think it is time for the US to adapt an energy tax, similar to any other vice tax.  They tax liquor, cigarettes, and gambling, why not energy?  An energy tax could be either a carbon tax or a per unit tax on the consumption of energy.  It is needed so consumers do not get the idea that energy is once again cheap and limitless.  

Pick a date in the past three years to 'normalize' energy prices to and make the tax adjust semiannually to make the price paid equal that number.  Any differential between consumer price and fair market price goes to the Government.  When the fair market price equals the normalized price the tax expires.  Fair market price is set by futures trading globally.  Normalized consumer price equals inflation adjusted energy prices from 2013. People don't get a shock because they have been paying those prices and surviving fine doing it.   This approach would guarantee the tax does expire when energy costs rebound, and consumers aren't stuck with stuff they cannot use when the energy prices rebound.  It also stabilizes energy cost for everyone. 

We could use funds from the energy tax to fix the millions of bridges we have ready to fall down or a lot of other stimulus type adventures, including incentives for conservation and R&D on renewables. 

It is government negligence for the price of fuel to continue to drop to the point where consumers think it is OK to do dumb things with energy.  Heat the driveway, buy a Hummer, put a heated outdoor pool in your lakeside home, etc.  Energy is cheap!!  Hooray!. 

It is time for an adult to take the truckload of chocolate away from the 5 year olds. 

Views: 351

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


This is a great way of saying it! Well done. You know the vast majority of us here on HEP agree with you - we're the choir. Your headline is such a great attention getter, a hook. I recommend you send this letter to your local and not-so-local newspapers' letter-to-the-editor sections. They will very likely publish it. And THAT will have an impact that will ripple through the pond.

“stuck with stuff they cannot use when the energy prices reboundThis is the peril of energy addiction. We are building our entire lives on the assumption that some commodity will remain at the same price level. It is more about risks than savings and it looks like it is not an issue that can be handled at the individual level. I am not a pro-government-intervention person but in this specific case, I think it is needed. Taxing lavish use of energy and using the ravenue for rebates to encourage efficient stuff is a good idea.

Someone told me Naomi Klein's new book has a passage about how high energy prices drive extreme fossil fuel extraction, and reward it. In North America, much of this extreme extraction is in or near Native Americans' lands. So low prices could paradoxically buy some time for these peoples and others to question the environmental cost of extreme extraction approaches.  I have not read the book yet but heard this.

Yes, very good, attention getting headline!

But the good news is that lower fuel prices:

will free up more $$ for the lower and middle class to spend on important things and help the economy

will create a disincentive for the Keystone Pipeline and Hydrofracting

it might free up enough money for more homeowners to invest in energy efficiency

and the bad news is:

it will incite the Republican majority, who already do not believe in Global Warming and believe that there should be less government intervention

As for "Heat the driveway, buy a Hummer, put a heated outdoor pool in your lakeside home, etc.  Energy is cheap!!  Hooray!" I know many second homeowners in this resort town that have the huge outdoor hot tub, the heated walkways, the house never below 65 deg., even if nobody is there for months. They may complain about the cost of fuel but are not interested in changing anything.

How about simply getting the government out of the energy business altogether? End ALL energy subsidies. Currently we pay a large portion of the real energy cost in our income tax bill (aka government subsidies and war). Let energy prices go to their natural levels and let the ENTIRE cost be reflected in utility bills.

That sounds good, but like my original idea here, it is futile. 235 representatives, 100 senators, 9 justices, 1 president. If you can buy 345 people, you can run the country. Last I heard Microsoft was sitting on a 40 billion war chest. Exxon probably gets that quarterly, as do the banks. A cheap election costs the victor several million dollars to rig, er... finance, that victor gets a salary south of 200K per year. If he/she is a congressperson, that contract is 2 years long. Senators get 6 years, presidents 4.
None of the people in power want this to change. I am not talking about public officials here, I am talking about the multi billionairres who continue to profit from the status quo.


Latest Activity

Chris Dorsi posted an event

2018 Habitat X Summer National Conference at Big Sky Montana

June 27, 2016 to June 29, 2016
The 2018 Habitat…See More
31 minutes ago
Stuart Langley liked David Byrnes's blog post Strategies for Hiring and Interviewing for Home Performance Professionals
4 hours ago
Kevin Miller replied to Bob Krell's discussion What Do You Do When You Find Suspected Mold? in the group Healthy Indoors (IAQ)
"Visual inspection can only confirm the presence of mold, not the absence.   That said,…"
7 hours ago
Armand C Magnelli replied to Don Fugler's discussion joining ducts in the group HVAC
"I often suggest pop-rivets as an alternative to sheet metal screws for both clothes dryer duct work…"
7 hours ago
Kevin Miller replied to Bob Krell's discussion What Do You Do When You Find Suspected Mold? in the group Healthy Indoors (IAQ)
"Sampling would be primarily to verify 'Condition 1' or 'Normal Fungal Ecology'…"
7 hours ago
Daniel Cullen joined Building Performance Institute's group

Building Performance Institute (BPI)

BPI is the nation's premier standards development, quality assurance and credentialing organization…See More
8 hours ago
Daniel Cullen replied to Bob Krell's discussion What Do You Do When You Find Suspected Mold? in the group Healthy Indoors (IAQ)
"Can anyone tell me exactly HOW mold sampling impacts the mold remediation process or protocol? Why…"
8 hours ago
Daniel Cullen joined Bob Krell's group

Healthy Indoors (IAQ)

The Healthy Indoors group is focused on indoor air quality (IAQ), mold, moisture control, radon,…See More
8 hours ago


  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service