Hello Home Energy Pros,

I'm looking for resources, articles, studies about how radon mitigation systems impact energy efficiency (electricity consumption from active systems, potential increases in air changes, changes to a HERS score, etc.).

If you know of a study or article based on good evidence and/or sound modeling, please paste a link in a reply.

Thanks!

Kevin Emerson
Utah Clean Energy

Tags: radon

Views: 692

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Kevin

I can comment based upon experience with construction and as a building official concerning semi-tight and passive house design.

First as a building official the Town had adopted a requirement for a minimum passive radon removal system before I was hired based upon minimal charges to install and heavy readings up to 225 pic in random testing. The basic system was basically a perforated pipe with a cloth sleeve installed as a loop around the interior house foundation in pea gravel, a moisture/radon material with heat welded seams and positive foundation connection and a three inch pipe inside one for the interior walls that could have an exhaust fan installed if necessary. This worked for every house to reduce the radon to acceptable standards to meet the EPA regulations.

On to my actual building experience. I had watched radon barriers of 6 mil sheet plastic with or without tape seams that were installed over the rock materials fail before construction was completed or allow moisture entry in the open lap seams. I found a 20 mil reinforced PVC membrane in used billboard sign faces that could be heat or chemically welded to provide both the moisture and radon barrier properties that I desired. There are other commercial systems available for this application. In my own new house that incorporated many air tight application barriers, I used the passive system in a none radon area and have had a zero reading while neighbors have a 20 to 40 reading. One additional thing that I used was a black ABS pipe through the roof that heats up and starts a convective current to pull any radon naturally.

The system works at a lesser cost than a retro fit application and builders who provide this initially have no problems during the house sale. Thus right or wrong a smart builder would create a solution at the least possible cost to make sure the home sells.

Kevin,

Thank you for raising this issue on the blog. 

The defining study on weatherization and radon, as best I can tell, was performed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory: httpweatherization.ornl.govRetrospectivepdfsORNL_TM-2014_338.pdf

Some of the participants in this study reported on their findings in the Spring Issue 2017 of Home Energy magazine: http://homeenergy.org/show/article/nav/hvac/id/2162

The conclusion, with plenty of caveats about uncertainty and the lack of in-depth long-term research regarding radon and weatherization, was that "On average, radon levels increased among treated homes following weatherization". Despite many caveats, the authors reported that statistically "there is less than 1 chance in 1,000 of observing a difference as large as we did between the two groups if weatherization has no effect on radon levels." The increase was not dramatically significant in absolute terms: an average of 0.4 picocuries per liter of air. However, in high-radon counties the control-adjusted increase was 40% (at 1.1pCi/l). They also observed beneficial effects on radon and other IAQ issues in a small study group where ASHRAE 62.2 compliant ventilation fans were introduced.

It is interesting to me that the microbiological effects of radon are disputed by some. A leading researcher at Columbia University (Professor Guy Garty) recently presented at a meeting of radon stakeholders in Johnson City, NY. His presentation was unequivocal about the health dangers related to radon - a subject he is personally interested in as his family's home is a high-radon area. The research is pretty definitive and lengthy on the health impacts of exposure to radon.  

By the way, the Oak Ridge report acknowledges that there are many benefits to weatherization. The benefits of weatherization is a topic that E4TheFuture is also taking on through a pilot effort in Massachusetts as reported in Healthy Indoors magazine Vol 5. No. 7 October 2017. Healthy Indoors Magazine has reported extensively on the issue of radon. One publication that caught my attention was a World Health Organization report (see the August 2016 issue). And, one of the most compelling statements from this report that stuck with me is: “There is no known threshold below which radon exposure carries no risk. The lower the radon concentration in a home, the lower the risk.” (The  EPA standard is 4 piC/l.)

Oh My! what is the Home Performance Contractor to do? At least, this is the question that has been nagging at us and it is helpful to know that we are not alone. 

After a lot of debate at our company, we have settled on two principles to guide us. First the Precautionary Principle ("When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.") and secondly, Risk Management (“the forecasting and evaluation of financial risks together with the identification of procedures to avoid or minimize their impact”). 

We have a responsibility first and foremost, to alert our customers of the potential of harm. Our work routinely involves warning our customers of potential dangers. Why should radon receive a special exclusion? Radon is hazardous to our health. If this issue is being studied by qualified institutions of research and science (like say the EPA or the WHO) and they are expressing their deep concerns, don’t we have a duty to share this information with our customers? The health risks of exposure to radon are not debatable, in our opinion. As we see it, the issues for us in Home Performance are: Are we making it better or worse for the people who are living in the homes we work on? And, equally important: Who gets to decide this issue and assume the associated risks – us or the customer?

We have adopted a policy that allows the customer to have their home tested before and after weatherization (at no cost). We provide them with an EPA approved booklet and we strongly recommend that they do this testing. Whether they want to proceed with mitigation or not is their choice, but our contract requires them to waive any right to hold us liable for their choice now or in the future. (BTW: we do not install radon mitigation systems; we are provided the test kits by a contractor that does.)

We don't know yet if we have opened a Pandora's box, but we are somewhat confident that our customers will appreciate that, where their health and safety is concerned, we will err on the side of precaution. We also think that our approach is prudent in terms of risk management. Are we likely to lose some business as a result? Yes, I think that is a reasonable assumption. Could any business loss be recouped by being regarded as mindful of the customer? Perhaps.

Ultimately and presently, this decision is more an act of individual conscience.  As such, if other contractors believe that the radon issue is a hoax, their consciences will probably dictate a very different course of action. We also think the choice is the customer's with respect to how much exposure should be considered safe.

The issue is vastly more complicated for program administrators at international, national and local levels and I believe they are struggling with how to come to terms with this too. 

 Note: We intend to collaborate with other radon stakeholders to collect data that will add to the growing understanding of this issue.

 

Kevin, I was recently made aware of a death in North Dakota that was directly contributed to radon exposure. Please follow this link for details:

http://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/in-a-first-radon...  

Kevin, Here's another link to the reported radon toxicity death in North Dakota. Follow this link:

http://www.inforum.com/lifestyle/health/4372217-my-own-mothers-home...

RSS

Forum Discussions

Efficiency of furnace

Started by Jignesh in General Forum. Last reply by Barbara Smith yesterday. 7 Replies

Best brands for furnace

Started by Jignesh in General Forum. Last reply by Barbara Smith yesterday. 1 Reply

Insulation Blower Recommendations?

Started by Jim Conlon in General Forum. Last reply by Cameron Home Insulation on Monday. 2 Replies

2005 EPAct tax credit

Started by Mandy Leazenby in General Forum. Last reply by Sean Lintow Sr on Thursday. 3 Replies

Latest Activity

Profile IconM Johnson and Jerry Phillips joined Home Energy Pros Forum
5 hours ago
Sara Watson posted a blog post

6 Tips to Pick Out The Best Solar Outdoor Lights

You have a beautiful home in Florida and plan to add a little sparkle to your front garden, patio,…See More
22 hours ago
DesignTech liked DesignTech's photo
yesterday
Anthony Roy is now a member of Home Energy Pros Forum
yesterday
Barbara Smith commented on Barbara Smith's video
yesterday
Barbara Smith replied to Jignesh's discussion Efficiency of furnace
"Installation and proper sizing is important to getting the best performance out of your furnace.…"
yesterday
Barbara Smith replied to Jignesh's discussion Best brands for furnace
"Check ENERGY STAR and Consumer Reports.…"
yesterday
Barbara Smith replied to Diane Chojnowski's discussion Support Mike Rogers, a long-time home performance hero, as he battles sinus cancer. in the group News & Announcements
yesterday
Barbara Smith joined Diane Chojnowski's group
Thumbnail

News & Announcements

Share your news and announcements with the community in this group.To post news or an announcement,…See More
yesterday
Diane Chojnowski added a discussion to the group News & Announcements
Thumbnail

Support Mike Rogers, a long-time home performance hero, as he battles sinus cancer.

Support Mike Rogers, a long-time home performance hero, as he battles sinus cancer. Write a note, a…See More
yesterday
Eric Kjelshus replied to Jignesh's discussion Efficiency of furnace
"I like looking at system efficiency - Lets say the you have a 95% gas using furnace 100,000…"
Monday
Cameron Home Insulation replied to Jim Conlon's discussion Insulation Blower Recommendations?
"Hi, Rent a Cellulose Insulation Blower from your local Home Depot. Get more information about…"
Monday
Todd Abercrombie liked Barbara Smith's video
Saturday
Jim Hensen replied to Jignesh's discussion Efficiency of furnace
"Great question - what the efficiency rating means is one of the most common questions we we asked.…"
Saturday
Michael Schettine's blog post was featured

Framing production combined with air sealing

Building Tighter Homes with Gasketed FramingIf you follow our blog, you know that we talk quite a…See More
Friday
Profile IconMichael E and Jason Dion joined Home Energy Pros Forum
Friday
Jason Dion joined Sean Lintow Sr's group
Thumbnail

Best Practices (Residential)

Best Building, Retrofitting, or even Auditing Practices - what are they, what should change, what…See More
Friday
Jason Dion joined Michael Stuart's group
Thumbnail

INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY USERS

This group is dedicated to knowledge sharing and discussion of infrared thermography for building…See More
Friday
Jason Dion joined allen p tanner's group
Thumbnail

Energy Auditing Equipment for Sale, Trade or to Purchase

Discuss the pros and cons of the equipment you are interested in prior to purchase. Post equipment…See More
Friday
Jason Dion joined Allison A. Bailes III's group
Thumbnail

HVAC

HVAC design, Manuals J, S, T, & D, Duct leakage, Air flow, ENERGY STAR new home requirements,…See More
Friday

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2018   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service