Hello Home Energy Pros,

I'm looking for resources, articles, studies about how radon mitigation systems impact energy efficiency (electricity consumption from active systems, potential increases in air changes, changes to a HERS score, etc.).

If you know of a study or article based on good evidence and/or sound modeling, please paste a link in a reply.

Thanks!

Kevin Emerson
Utah Clean Energy

Tags: radon

Views: 781

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have been finding more to support the idea that Radon is a tempest in a teapot.  

I found the following article and discussion interesting. 

The take away that I got from these is that mitigation is usually not necessary and is encouraged by an industry trying to justify itself. 

This first is a discussion by industry professionals:

http://homeenergypros.lbl.gov/forum/topics/radon-truth-vs-myth

This article is a scientific perspective:

http://www.forensic-applications.com/radon/radon.html

I've read this article, too, and found it very informative. I now do not consider radon a major issue, certainly not at typical residential levels.

I have no links, just some anecdotal evidence. I ran several Blower Door Tests on my own home. So I know what the leakage was. After I tested for Radon, 10 pcl I thought about not mitigating. I also thought about mitigating just before the time of sale. I decided to spend some money now, instead of leaving it to my wife later to figure out. We have been here 30 years and have another 20 to go. My post test was 0 pcl.

I ran some blower door tests after I installed the system; with the fan going and without it going. The change in the Blower Door fan flow, with single point or multi-point testing, was not noticeable. It did not change the HERS Rating. The fan mentioned in one of the links below called 21 watts on the fan draw. Over a year that is less than 9 KWH. At 15¢, I can afford $1.35 annual. That will not change the HERS Index either.

If you read the RESNET/ICC/ ANSI Standard 380, it calls for the house to be set to winter conditions before running the blower door. Doors and windows shut. The Radon Fan will run in winter conditions. That should not impact the HERS Score either.

My observation is that Radon testing and mitigation is a fact of life at Real Estate Sales. The agents will recommend the test. They will push their buyer to have the seller remediate or walk away. I am aware of one house on the market for 2 years, because the owner will not allow the test to be run, much less remediate. Several large RE firms will not take her listing. This is a Zone II Radon area. Only 1 in 4 homes.

You may or may buy the science, when you decide to sell, you will test and then mitigate as needed. Or not sell and let your heirs handle the problem.

Hey John,

Thanks for the information.  Very good empirical data. While I agree that running the fan won't cost much or change the HERS score. I just question is it necessary in the first place.  I also just wonder if sellers and buyers are being held captive by Real Estate and Mitigation folks for monetary rather than health reasons.  

So, is it, that it doesn't matter if Radon really isn't that dangerous, But, if you want to sell, you do what we say. 

The Nay side is well represented with the links already posted.

I presented a neutral side, with the argument about time of sale issues.

The Yea side is well represented, but will not show up here, due to folks accepted the science the EPA and State Radon agencies have developed. The largest acceptors of that science are homeowner that pay for the mitigation systems.

Folks may pause before spending money to save money with energy efficiency improvements. They will pay money to improve comfort. They will pay money to remove a health hazard from their home.

I believe that there is a plethora of studies to support the dangers of Radon. I was a radiation specialist in the Nuclear Naval Submarine Service and I have a degree in physics. I understand the source and mechanism of Radon. It is a long term affect and is cumulative. Each atom of radioactive Radon gas that enters your lungs has a short half-life and will likely decay to other radioactive elements, as well as giving off alpha particles. Alpha particles are the most damaging type of radiation for close proximity. An alpha particle is the nucleus of a Helium atom, but without any electrons. Both its relative mass and its electrical charge will damage one or more lung cells. Keep repeating that and you not only have lung cells that are damaged, but you are setting up conditions for the cells to reproduce in uncontrolled fashion, or lung cancer.

Do take Radon seriously. Don't guess, test!

It's good to see somebody who has some REAL scientific knowledge commenting on the real danger of radon.  I was required to take MANY HOURS of training on radon properties & dangers, and I am convinced of the dangers.  The cost is negligible, both installation and operation.  The levels, if properly mitigated, and not later compromised by basement "waterproofing" or other modifications to the structure, will not be affected by efficiency measures.  The realtors would all love to see the radon situation disappear; it's one of many possible "deal killers."

Brad, 

The dangers of Ionized radiation is known but the issue is at what level does the damage become an issue. 

I spent 20 years in Biotechnology/Immunology working with radioactive materials and wastes so I have a bit of dog in the fight so I really want the best information. Cell damage is happening all the time from many assaults. We know what large doses can do but when we get into lower levels of exposure it is not clear.

The question is the LNT (linear no threshold) hypothesis that is the crux of determining the dangers of low-level exposures and this is where the waters get murky.

Most of the major studies are based on the initial BIER studies with uranium miners as a baseline. It has been my observation that many of the studies have some underlying factors that make them difficult to extrapolate some of the data. I am not a statistician and wish I had a better understanding of how they remove bias and confounding factors in these studies. 


From the International Atomic Energy Asso-

"low doses of radiation, there is still considerable uncertainty about the overall effects. It is presumed that exposure to radiation, even at the levels of natural background, may involve some additional risk of cancer. However, this has yet to be established."

Source-
https://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/radlife 


Here is an article from the NIH that actually tries to state there is a hormetic effect, which I personally am a little iffy on also, but just shows how murky the information really is.

Source-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315166/


The 4 pCi/L action level still seems like an arbitrary number based on some assumptions that are just guesswork on costs and effects.

My biggest issues are the numbers attributed to radon-induced lung cancer. These numbers are pure guesswork since it is based on yet to be firmly proven Hypothesis.

When we get into these low-level dose environments there can be confounding factors that can skew the information one way or another. I guess I am just being a skeptic and I am just waiting for what I think is proper irrefutable proof related to low-level doses.

We should be looking at all the available data though.

John, thanks for the information, it was very helpful.

Thank you Andrew, Ray, and John for sharing the information and links!

Kevin

It seems to me that a newly-constructed home with a proper vapor barrier installed below the slab would greatly help reduce radon infiltration into a home.   How has more modern construction practices, such as building code changes and energy efficiency codes, made a difference in radon infiltration into a home? 

RSS

Forum Discussions

Mini split air conditioners and ceiling fans

Started by Beverly Lerch in General Forum. Last reply by Daniel Baur-McGuire yesterday. 4 Replies

DIY Filter Solution for an Evaporative Cooler, anyone?

Started by Leslie Jackson in HVAC. Last reply by Daniel Baur-McGuire yesterday. 6 Replies

VERY TIGHT HOME WITH OVER SIZED AC

Started by Jerry Needham in BPI. Last reply by Tim O'Brien yesterday. 5 Replies

Apply now for the Jon Siemen Memorial Scholarship!

Started by Diane Chojnowski in General Forum. Last reply by Quinn Korzeniecki on Thursday. 1 Reply

Log home roof insulation

Started by Bob Reuther in Best Practices. Last reply by Bob Reuther Aug 7. 10 Replies

Latest Activity

Profile Iconyanky fogel, Kathleen Krebs, Nicholas Rubenstein and 3 more joined Home Energy Pros Forum
3 hours ago
yanky fogel liked Home Energy Magazine's video
8 hours ago
Franco Oyuela commented on Shawn Weeks's blog post How Homeowners Can Keep Electricity Costs Down in Summer Months
"Cutting back on air conditioning is also good for the environment because it reduces carbon…"
12 hours ago
Seventhwave posted events
13 hours ago
Franco Oyuela commented on John White's blog post Top Reasons to Consider Seasonal HVAC Maintenance
"They say an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and when it comes to HVAC units, this…"
13 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski's video was featured

1950s Home Retrofit to Super Efficient Passive House - Urban Green Building

This 1950s Montreal house was retrofitted to become a super efficient passive house by adding a 16 inch thick layer of cellulose insulation to the exterior. Maison Ozalée's builder, Richard Price from Construction Le Tournesol, also used triple…
16 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski posted a video

1950s Home Retrofit to Super Efficient Passive House - Urban Green Building

This 1950s Montreal house was retrofitted to become a super efficient passive house by adding a 16 inch thick layer of cellulose insulation to the exterior. ...
16 hours ago
Profile IconSara Melucci, Hayden Sloan and Jediah Krajcik joined Home Energy Pros Forum
yesterday
Daniel Baur-McGuire replied to Beverly Lerch's discussion Mini split air conditioners and ceiling fans
"Running a ceiling fan actually heats up air. Allison Bailes has some great articles on it.  I…"
yesterday
Daniel Baur-McGuire replied to Leslie Jackson's discussion DIY Filter Solution for an Evaporative Cooler, anyone?
"Where are the supply runs located? Look to make sure supply runs are sealed. I would second having…"
yesterday
Tim O'Brien replied to Jerry Needham's discussion VERY TIGHT HOME WITH OVER SIZED AC
"New build may not have been "dry" before finished and occupied. Residual moisture from…"
yesterday
Daniel Baur-McGuire replied to Jerry Needham's discussion VERY TIGHT HOME WITH OVER SIZED AC
"Oversized A/C systems wont pull out enough moisture from the conditioned air. I would check to make…"
yesterday
Efficiency First California's blog post was featured
yesterday
Laurie DiDonato posted a blog post

HERS Rater Training Discount ($200) Ends August 20th!

Online: September 17-28th (Times TBA)Classroom: October 1-5th in Manchester, NHFull fee: $2595…See More
yesterday
Profile IconNorthWest AeroBarrier and david beckwith joined Home Energy Pros Forum
Friday
John White posted a blog post
Friday
Efficiency First California posted a blog post
Friday
Franco Oyuela commented on Fresh Air Duct Cleaning's blog post Moving in to a new home and why you should get a Duct Cleaning
"There is no evidence to suggest that clean ducts leads to better overall health. However, it should…"
Friday
Franco Oyuela replied to Beverly Lerch's discussion Mini split air conditioners and ceiling fans
"Using a ceiling fan as part of a team to bring your maximum home cooling comfort. Adding a ceiling…"
Friday
Beverly Lerch replied to Beverly Lerch's discussion Mini split air conditioners and ceiling fans
"Thank you.  Good information about the ceiling fans."
Thursday

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2018   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service