Do Government and Utility Rebate Programs Help or Hurt?

I say ... they hurt.  What say you?

Views: 1708

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Patrick,


When you can cite for me where my origin of debt to you resides, I will gladly and freely give up my own hard-earned income to pay for your air sealing, insulation, etc. Until then, prop yourself up like any other business owner does (if you are one...I don't know). It is not my job, nor the governments to prop up ANY industry, regardless of what you deem to be important or valuable.


Funny how you, in one breath, tell us to "stay the hell out your way", but yet you need my money to help you feel sustained? That defies logical reasoning at the highest of levels. It is akin to an abortion advocate telling someone to keep off of their uterus or out of their bedroom...but wanting the government to pay for abortion services or birth control.


As for what you deem a "bridge fuel"...I am an all of the above kind of guy. I see the value in wind power, solar, wave power, natural gas, etc. and feel they all should be utilized to their full strength and value to the market. But it is purely ridiculous to say or infer that we should just shut off the spicket for oil until these other resources are fully capable of sustaining us a country. What do you propose we do in the meantime for the next,,,ummm,, 20-30 years? Just die by vine, so you can feel like you are being supported by those that came before you?


There are reasons why these other innovations have fallen on their face in recent years...they are too expensive and they have enormous payback periods. Wind power can only be used in certain regions of the country efficiently, solar panels are expensive as all get out, which is why we have to rely on the Chinese to build them (see Solyndra). Natural gas is a fantastic resource that we should be going after diligently...BUT NO...environmentalists have to step in to put their foot down on its exploration and refining capabilities which raises the price due to the compliance costs caused by additional regulation.

John, I'm not here to argue, but I am here to support good men and women engaged in an industry that is sorely needed in the future.

I have been in this industry for more than 3 years now, and have run a business for over 2 years. I began my career in HP with a custom builder, and continue to work with builders. What I have witnessed has been very clear: We build and renovate buildings today with a focus to the bottom line, and as a result the buildings suffer. I grew up in Boston where you have many very old houses that will stand for many more decades, and these houses were built by craftsmen and women. They were built during a time where fuel was cheap, people didn't use a lot of energy (instead they just bundled up or dealt with hotter days in traditional ways), and profits were typically slim.

HP is the only check I can see on overzealous developers and builders. I just toured a brand new housing development built by a major developer, and I found so many weaknesses. This crap is exactly why I got into this industry, and why I know that if we're going to subsidize anyone it might as well be HP guys and gals. I don't want or need the money, but many of them need it. They are not salesmen and women, they are building scientists and pros, and many times their only agenda is to create better buildings...is this not a desirable thing for society?

John, why don't guys like you and me help support these folks by partnering with them and helping them to do what they do best? I am all about rising tides for everyone, and in this case "everyone" is the contractor, the building scientist (auditor), the HO, and the utility ratepayers. Are you against this line of thinking? Would you sacrifice your principles or professional standards to make an extra buck? I want to believe that guys like you care as much as I do (and as much as these HP folks do), but be real with me and answer whether you care or not? Ultimately, let's not waste our time debating with each other.

Wow. This is an interesting discussion, for a technical forum. Calling incentives "socialist" is pretty weak. Even if there were such a thing as a free market, it would operate only as well as its incentives programs worked.  Incentives allow us to hasten shifts in the markets.  They act as trim-tabs, using small relative amounts of money and other resources to make large course adjustments. You may think of them as evil but they are intrinsic to this economy and every other, and not going away.  The largest incentive programs in our economy are those managed by the IRS, of course, steering dollars to places that do the most good for the "public." - including collecting no taxes from the major oil companies.

Utility incentives are simply demand-side operating costs and have been inadequate by billions of total dollars in the 37 years I have been doing business with them and their customers.

Insulation ends up being the concept of the absolute least interest to the American people, yet the most important concept of the hundred years we are in the middle of. No illusionary free market will deal with that.  The Army could, but that would probably seem like "the man" stepping on the toes of the energy "freedom fighters."

Ask not if rebate programs help or hurt, ask how we have to change them so they speed up the retrofit of the 50 million houses still left on the list.  Technically, we need more and larger...

 

 

 

Hi Tom,

It sounds like we agree, incentives distort markets("hasten shifts"). 

Don't you think, after all this time, the HP guys could grow up and act like real businesses?

Do you feel HP folks deserve welfare and charity? Has the welfare system been helpful or incapacitating?

Calling the HP "industry" socialistic is not name calling but simply correctly identifying the structure of the process. It is however a very inefficient way to allocate resources and this can be seen over and over in the programs you promote. But, It is what it is. 

Well, Tom...What do you call taking the fruits of one man's labor and giving it to another under the guise of making things equal or "fair". If you need a copy of the Communist Manifesto, I can surely mail one out to you.

You telling us you disagree doesn't muster here. Break the argument and tell us how these programs are NOT socialist in nature.


You know, I am really looking forward to the day when all of this federal money dries up, because it will be those like Linda and myself, who have acted purely as independent entrepreneurs through this whole process, who will be the only ones left standing. Gotta love less competition!!!

RSS

Latest Activity

Bradford E. White replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Agreed! True, if an open plan. Simple is best. But away spaces seem to be making a come-back. And…"
52 minutes ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Jerry, as an energy consultant I imagine you are well versed in solar systems. Have you seen how…"
1 hour ago
Scott Mills replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"I have found that ceiling fans are the simplest way to control room stratification "
2 hours ago
Matt Peiris replied to H.O. Electric's discussion Stop Drinking Bottled Water! in the group News & Announcements
"Well water consumers need to test their water every year. Elevated arsenic, nitrate levels or…"
3 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Jerry I don't have videos posted yet but I have some nice pictures from customers. See them…"
3 hours ago
Scott Mills is now a member of Home Energy Pros Forum
3 hours ago
Bradford E. White replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Qualified "It Depends" kind of answer. 1. Temperature Perception: There is an intangible…"
3 hours ago
John Carton posted a discussion

Insulation touches underside of roof in home with no soffit or soffit venting.

I performed an assessment for a recent home buyer and the home inspector they hired when they…See More
3 hours ago
Jerry Needham replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Kurt Thanks for the information on the whole house fan and the advise about leaving the fan on all…"
4 hours ago
James White replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"There is more than fan energy to be saved by setting fans to run on "auto". Most forced…"
4 hours ago
Kurt Shafer replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Jerry, I am a whole house fan expert but not an HVAC expert. However, I have no idea why any HVAC…"
4 hours ago
Jerry Needham replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Ken This is a great response.  Lots of arguments against leaving the fan on. THANKS"
4 hours ago
Luke Langhals replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"If an E/HRV system is installed in unison with the furnace ducting -- you might consider making the…"
4 hours ago
Ken Summers replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"At Comfort Institute we get asked this question all the time.  The argument for leaving the…"
4 hours ago
Allison A. Bailes III replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Jerry, as Chris Heenan said below, running the fan continuously will raise the indoor humidity in…"
4 hours ago
Chris Heenan replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"In regions with _high_ humidity, running the fan continuously will be put moisture that the…"
4 hours ago
Barbara Smith replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Eliminating continuous furnace fan operation is #3 on list of top ways to cut energy use, in this…"
4 hours ago
tedkidd replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"There is no Pat answer. It depends. In a well performing home with proplerly sized equipment and…"
4 hours ago
Barbara Smith replied to Jerry Needham's discussion HVAC Question about running fan continuously Vs. setting on Auto so it runs when AC or Furnace runs
"Many of our Wisconsin residents do not yet have the ECM (electrically commutated motors) though…"
4 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski posted a video

Passive House Explained in 90 Seconds

I'm a Passive House enthusiast. I'm involved in this great movement to create highly energy efficient buildings that use 80 to 90% less energy. But how? Peop...
5 hours ago

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2018   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service