Unless I have this wrong, the BPI CAZ depressurization limits and draft calculations are for gas boilers and furnaces.  Up here in New England we have a lot of oil burners.  It would seem that it would take a lot more negative pressure in a CAZ to get an oil burner to spill.  I have flue pressures for oil of: <10 F at -15 Pa, 11 - 40F at -13 Pa, 41 - 60F at -11 Pa, 61 - 90F at -9 Pa, and >90F at -7Pa.

Tags: Oil, burner, limits, pressure

Views: 350

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Paul,
We see lots of fuel oil in the NC mountains where we have been training BPI for over 2.5 years now. After many discussions with several trainers i have come to the conclusion that the fuel oil burner should be classified the same as an induced fan furnace receiving a CAZ Depressurization limit of -15. However, High Retention Head Burners may allow this limit to go even lower. I would love an official BPI interpretation on this issue.
I have recently received a reply from Tony Peters QA for Affiliates for BPI who states that, "CAZ depressurization limits shall be identical for gas or oil fueled combustion appliances. An oil fueled combustion appliance shall not be classified as a mechanically assisted draft appliance. Please classify oil fueled combustion appliances as natural draft boilers or furnaces." He also says, "Draft calculations shall also be identical for oil or gas fueled combustion appliances. Please follow the acceptable draft test results chart found on page 10 of BA for all natural draft appliances."
Seems a bit odd to me, but he explains that, "if the oil fueled combustion appliance has been installed with a barometric damper connected to the vent pipe, it cannot support a -15Pa CAZ depressurization limit."

RSS

Forum Discussions

Home Energy Pros and #MeToo

Started by Mike Rogers in General Forum. Last reply by Diane Chojnowski 4 hours ago. 1 Reply

How would you insulate this roof?

Started by David Butler in General Forum. Last reply by David Butler 23 hours ago. 34 Replies

Psychrometric Chart Training

Started by John Krochmalny in Training. Last reply by Mahendra Shah on Friday. 1 Reply

Latest Activity

Blake Shurtz posted a discussion

Replacement for Energy Conservatory Flow-blaster

It's too bad that the flow-blaster is no longer being produced or technically supported. Does…See More
2 hours ago
Diane Chojnowski replied to Mike Rogers's discussion Home Energy Pros and #MeToo
"Mike, thanks so much for supporting women and the #MeToo campaign. Women everywhere  have…"
4 hours ago
Profile IconBrian Cizmar, Charles Allen, Charles Buell and 1 more joined Home Energy Pros Forum
5 hours ago
Mike Rogers posted a discussion

Home Energy Pros and #MeToo

If it doesn't seem obvious why a discussion of …See More
8 hours ago
David Butler replied to David Butler's discussion How would you insulate this roof?
"Sean Lintow proposed rails and clips (re: first comment in this discussion), but in the context of…"
23 hours ago
Brad Cook replied to David Butler's discussion How would you insulate this roof?
"I missed where the suggestion for rails came in. The plywood would not need any rails. 4+ inches is…"
yesterday
David Butler replied to David Butler's discussion How would you insulate this roof?
"I'm a little confused about the necessity and purpose of using support rails if working on…"
yesterday
David Butler replied to David Butler's discussion How would you insulate this roof?
"If you insulate master bedroom and family room from below, you definitely need more R-value than…"
yesterday

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2017   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service