I am curious about other's experience as I get asked the following question all the time: 

Is it necessary to pull out a poorly installed batt of insulation or will a subsequent blow of cellulose or fiberglass fill in most of the missing gaps? What are people's experiences?

Thanks. 

Tags: insulation, retrofit

Views: 461

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

When topping off an existing ceiling with batts, there's a cost to pulling out the old. True, the blown-in may not fill in all the gaps, but you'd likely get more benefit by spending that money on additional blown-in on top. A more worthy reason to pull out the old would be to gain access to the ceiling to do proper air sealing. Even then, you don't necessarily need to remove it unless it's full of mice droppings, etc.

Best practice would be to remove the old poorly installed stuff to gain access for comprehensive air sealing, eave vent baffle installation, chimney air seal and insulation dams, etc. and then re-insulate with blown in. If best practice is not your goal or is too expensive then you still shouldn't just top it off - too many voids will exist under the poorly installed stuff and air sealing is still the primary savings opportunity. An alternative - After strategic cost effective air sealing is completed (and proper eave vent baffle and chimney dams, etc.) you could consider blowing under the poorly installed batt while leaving it in place to fill the joist cavity, then top off as well. I've also heard of people moving it aside and reinstalling while working in sections at a time but labor to do this leads one to might as well throw it away. Obviously if its mouse ridden or otherwise of no use then dumpster it.

The "sad" part is the attic insulation is new and clean. The house was remodeled a few years ago and they want AC b/c it is so hot. Poor batt insulation quality with big skylight shafts have to be part of the problem. 

What Matt said.

Remove everything.

Air seal. Ideally with 2 part foam.

Blower door test to find remaining leaks.

Install fresh.

The insulation has little value without air sealing. More of worthless is still worthless.

We are removing insulation added as recently as one year ago. Adds a lot of cost to our projects.

After lifting specific batts for blower-door/IR/experience guided air sealing, (rarely with 2 part foam) my crews will use a narrow rake to push batts down against the ceiling and around wiring and framing anomalies.  Then we will blow on top.  Don't forget to drop any ducts to the attic floor and seal and blow over.  For walls, we will at times dense-pack into a batted cavity that is obviously poorly done.  Unless the attic batt is full of bat and mouse yuch, insulation is doing more good in the attic than in the dumpster.

I have seen this done well too and may be the best cost effective approach considering the insulation is in good condition. It does have value if installed like it was meant to be. Air tightness is the indicator of success. If you are good with blower door zonal testing and IR and finding the leaks in a fully covered attic then success is achievable. Make sure to get at those skylight shaft walls, maybe dense pack those or enclose in rigid board if you can get board up there.

It's far more sustainable to re-use existing product if there's no hazard. (It's also cheaper! And easier!)

You want to assure that the attic is air-sealed anyway, so when you put them back you have a cheap opportunity to undo the worst of the mis-aligned batt insulation. Or, wrap a bunch of them around those skylight shafts and enclose them with an air barrier. (Or maybe you use a vapor barrier, if West Hills, CA is an A/C-dominant climate zone. I'm from Wisconsin, I have no experience of your world...)

Your message implies the shafts aren't insulated much if at all. You're going to have to haul batts or board material up there to insulate them any way -- use what the builder gave you instead of hauling up new product

Then blow new insulation in as indicated, and you're good to go.

Did a major retrofit a while ago, on a house with 3-4 inches of rock wool in the attic. We had the choice of bagging it, humping it through the house and throwing it out in the Dumpster -- or bagging it and throwing it in a corner of the attic, to re-use. My choice saved only saved me $50 in new cellulose and Dumpster fees, but it also saved us several dozen trips up down and back up two flights of stairs.

I agree, it is wasteful to remove and dump old insulation. It still does its job. Air sealing is important so after that's done blow cellulose and a good job will be had for a much lower price.

It's far more sustainable to re-use existing product, if there's no hazard. (It's also cheaper! And easier!)

You want to assure that the attic is air-sealed anyway, so when you put them back you have a cheap opportunity to undo the worst of the mis-aligned batt insulation. Or, wrap a bunch of them around those skylight shafts and enclose them with an air barrier. (Or maybe you use a vapor barrier, if West Hills, CA is an A/C-dominant climate zone. I'm from Wisconsin, I have no experience of your world...)

Your message implies the shafts aren't insulated much if at all. You're going to have to haul batts or board material up there to insulate them any way -- use what the builder gave you instead of hauling up new product

Then blow new insulation in as indicated, and you're good to go.

Did a major retrofit a while ago, on a house with 3-4 inches of rock wool in the attic. We had the choice of bagging it, humping it through the house and throwing it out in the Dumpster -- or bagging it and throwing it in a corner of the attic, to re-use. My choice saved only saved me $50 in new cellulose and Dumpster fees, but it also saved us several dozen trips up down and back up two flights of stairs.

YES, YES, & YES!!!

Bat droppings, mouse droppings, dead mice, nuts, seeds, acorns, lack of access to properly air seal, these are a few of my least favorite things . . .

"A 1994 report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) listed fiberglass as a human carcinogen, according to the American Lung Association. To warn users about the danger of this product, OSHA and the IARC required that all fiberglass insulation packages contain health warning labels. As of 2009, these labels were still required, despite a 2001 IARC report that fiberglass is not a likely carcinogen."

RSS

Forum Discussions

Latest Activity

Dannie Jackson shared a profile on Facebook
13 minutes ago
Dannie Jackson posted a blog post
24 minutes ago
Charles Buell replied to David Meiland's discussion Air gap above floor insulation--how big is the impact?
"Water lines should simply not be located in problem areas and if the floor is properly insulated…"
1 hour ago
Kevin Brauer replied to David Meiland's discussion Air gap above floor insulation--how big is the impact?
"My retrofit work: Dense packing a 2-3’ perimeter for air seal, while keeping air space can…"
1 hour ago
David Byrnes replied to David Byrnes's discussion When can an oversized A/C be a good thing?
"Thanks for the feedback David"
6 hours ago
Claude Waudoit posted a discussion

Ecological faucets: Hot water is available as quickly as using a DHW loop, but without wasting water or energy.

I am looking for partners, supports and funding.I am also looking for reliable information…See More
18 hours ago
Charles Buell replied to David Meiland's discussion Air gap above floor insulation--how big is the impact?
"Exactly  David.  And then there is the fact the energy codes require the insulation be…"
18 hours ago
David Butler replied to David Meiland's discussion Air gap above floor insulation--how big is the impact?
"Adding an airspace changes the temperature gradient, as noted in Joe's doc, thus making the…"
20 hours ago

© 2018   Created by Home Performance Coalition (HPC)   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service